Forget normalization – Saudi Arabia steps up boycott of Israel

By: Michael Freund – The Jerusalem Post

Despite efforts by Washington in recent years to bring about a normalization of relations between Israel and the Arab world, Saudi Arabia has been steadily intensifying its enforcement of the Arab League boycott of Israel, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

A review of US Commerce Department data conducted by the Post found that the number of boycott-related and restrictive trade-practice requests received by American companies from Saudi Arabia has increased in each of the past two years, rising from 42 in 2006 to 65 in 2007 to 74 in 2008, signifying a jump of more than 76 percent.

The bulk of these requests were related to the companies’ or products’ relationship to Israel. Typically, Saudi officials ask foreign suppliers to affirm that any goods exported to the desert kingdom are not manufactured in Israel and do not contain any Israeli-made components.

US law bars American companies from complying with such demands, and requires them to report any boycott-related requests to the federal government.

The Commerce Department figures reflect only those requests that have been officially reported to the US government. Figures for 2009 were not yet available.

Contacted by the Post, a US Treasury Department official confirmed that there was ample evidence that the Saudis continued to enforce the boycott.

According to the official, statistics compiled by a number of US government departments and federal agencies all “indicate that American companies continue to receive boycott requests from Saudi Arabia.”

Citing figures collected by the Internal Revenue Service, the official said that of the cases that were reported to the IRS, “55% of the boycott requests from Saudi Arabia led to boycott agreements.”

Two months ago, the Treasury Department published a list of eight Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, that it says continue to boycott Israel. The list appeared in the Federal Register, the official journal of the US government.

Washington has been attempting to get Riyadh to improve relations with the Jewish state, without success.

On July 31, after talks with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal rejected Washington’s efforts, telling reporters, “Incrementalism and a step-by-step approach has not and, we believe, will not lead to peace.”

Saudi Arabia’s ongoing enforcement of the boycott also appears to violate repeated promises that it gave to Washington in recent years to drop the trade embargo.

In November 2005, the desert kingdom pledged to abandon the boycott after Washington conditioned Saudi Arabia’s entry into the World Trade Organization on such a move. A month later, on December 11, Saudi Arabia was granted WTO membership.

The WTO, which aims to promote free trade, prohibits members from engaging in discriminatory practices such as boycotts or embargoes.

The Saudi boycott of Israeli-made goods is part of the decades-old Arab League effort to isolate and weaken the Jewish state.

The league established an Office for the Boycott of Israel in Damascus in 1951, aimed at overseeing implementation of the economic and trade embargo.

In recent years, enforcement of the boycott has waxed and waned. Some Arab League members, such as Egypt and Jordan, ceased applying it after signing peace treaties with Israel, while others, such as Mauritania, Morocco and Tunisia do not enforce it. Other Arab states, such as Lebanon, Syria and Iraq, continue to bar entry of goods made in Israel and those containing Israeli-made components.

Please note: These stories are located outside of Prophecy Today’s website. Prophecy Today is not responsible for their content and does not necessarily agree with the views expressed therein. These articles are provided for your information.

Saddam’s legacy thrives in the Arab world

By: David Keyes – The Jerusalem Post

Saddam Hussein killed more Arabs and Muslims than any other Middle Eastern leader in recent history. He committed genocide against the Kurds, launched wars of aggression against Iran and Kuwait, launched missiles at Israel and Saudi Arabia, tortured innocents without compunction and imposed totalitarianism in Iraq. His regime brought unprecedented war, terror and misery to the region. Why, then, does the Butcher of Baghdad remain such a heroic figure to so many Arabs?

Two decades ago, famed historian Bernard Lewis wrote a prescient piece in The Wall Street Journal titled “Not everybody hates Saddam” in which he examined the pro-Saddam narrative of some Arabs. Since then, not much has changed. On a recent trip to Amman, I asked dozens of Jordanians how they felt about the dictator. Tragically, though not surprisingly, Saddam still has a great many fans in the Arab world. Nearly every single Jordanian I spoke with had high praise for the deceased tyrant.

“He gave us free oil,” said one. “He stood up to the West,” opined another. One cab driver, who had pins with Saddam’s picture covering his dashboard, informed me that Saddam was the greatest leader in the Middle East – “Only he was capable of keeping order in Iraq.”

TWO PREDOMINANT themes emerged in all my conversations. First, Saddam was seen as the leader of resistance to America and Israel. He fought two wars against America in slightly over a decade and launched dozens of Scud missiles at Israel while other nations stood by. Second, he imposed order in Iraq. True, it was an order of rape, pillage and plunder, but at least it was order. Prizing stability over liberty is the root of so many of the region’s ills.

In Arab societies, one quickly realizes that anything can be excused in the name of opposing the West. Some in the Jordanian public had high praise for al-Qaida, for example, when it was hijacking planes and bombing American civilians, but support for the group dropped dramatically once it struck in Amman in 2005. Most Jordanians also never felt the sheer terror of Saddam’s regime. They were never suffocated by sarin and VX nerve gas raining down from the skies, never had to flee from helicopter gunships mowing down innocents by the tens of thousands and never had to worry that Uday Hussein, the notorious rapist, would take a liking to their daughter while prowling the streets.

Infuriated by the adulation I heard for Saddam, I asked a friend who had served as chief of staff to one of Iraq’s highest politicians to help make sense of this madness. “That is the prevailing mentality in the Arab world,” he said. “People in this region are historically insecure. For at least 1,000 years there was nothing but darkness. The glory of the past is so important for them because there is no present, no contribution to modern civilization. Modernity means nothing. History is a continuous crusade-Zionist conspiracy against them, etc. etc. I have no other explanation.”

AT LEAST one Jordanian informed me that he did not like to talk politics, but that his entire family was killed by Saddam during the invasion of Kuwait. I mentioned the adulation I had heard for Saddam over the past week and he just shook his head with quiet indignation.

Worship of a genocidal dictator mustn’t be excused under any circumstances. To do so is to fall prey to the “soft bigotry of low expectations,” to quote a former US president. Admiration for Saddam is a mix of abject ignorance and colossal moral failure. Such madness should not be met with tepid academic interest or casual dismissal. Rather, it must be castigated in no uncertain terms and righted as soon as possible, primarily through education. Those who cheer tyranny from the sidelines are no less responsible than the tyrant himself.

Please note: These stories are located outside of Prophecy Today’s website. Prophecy Today is not responsible for their content and does not necessarily agree with the views expressed therein. These articles are provided for your information.

09/14/09

* EU, Iran to hold nuke talks on Oct. 1 Iran will meet with world powers next month for the first time in more than a year in an attempt to reduce tensions over its refusal to curb nuclear activities, while Teheran warned Israel and the US on Monday against a military strike.

* Netanyahu Rejects Full Settlement Halt Ahead of Mitchell Talks Israel will not impose a total freeze on West Bank settlement construction and will move ahead with projects already approved, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said ahead of talks with U.S. envoy George Mitchell.

* Bin Laden calls Obama ‘powerless’ in Afghan war Al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden described President Barack Obama as “powerless” to stop the war in Afghanistan and threatened to step up guerrilla warfare there in a new audiotape released to mark the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks in the United States.

* Terror group builds big base under Pakistani officials’ noses A Pakistani terrorist group that’s allied with al Qaida and sends jihadists to Afghanistan to fight U.S. and government troops is building a huge new base in full view of the authorities in Pakistan’s most heavily populated province, locals and officials told McClatchy.

* Forget normalization – Saudi Arabia steps up boycott of Israel Despite efforts by Washington in recent years to bring about a normalization of relations between Israel and the Arab world, Saudi Arabia has been steadily intensifying its enforcement of the Arab League boycott of Israel.

* Saddam’s legacy thrives in the Arab world Saddam Hussein killed more Arabs and Muslims than any other Middle Eastern leader in recent history.

* Venezuela’s Chavez touts $2.2 million arms deal with Russia The announcement comes amid growing tensions between the leftist leader and the conservative government of Colombia, which recently agreed to host US military personnel on its bases.

* Obama to urge financial overhaul US President Barack Obama is poised to call on Congress to approve an overhaul of the US regulatory regime.

* Urgency in US Middle East talks The US Middle East envoy George Mitchell said Washington shared in a “sense of urgency” following talks with Israeli President Shimon Peres.

* China-U.S. Trade Dispute Has Broad Implications An increasingly acrimonious trade dispute between China and the United States over the past three days is officially about tires, chickens and cars, but is really much broader.

09/12/09

Meridor confirms PM visited Russia Intelligence Affairs Minister Dan Meridor on Saturday confirmed that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu secretly visited Russia on Monday.

* US ready for N Korea direct talks The US says it would hold direct talks with North Korea to persuade it to return to stalled multilateral talks on ending its nuclear program.

* Iran’s defense minister: Nuclear weapons are against our religion New Iranian Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi denied on Saturday that the Islamic Republic was striving to acquire nuclear weapons.

* Egypt, Jordan Join Arab League in Resisting Normalization Recently, the Arab League declared that Arab countries would not normalize ties with Israel until Israel gives in to Arab demands.

* Six powers accept Iranian offer to talk The United States and five partner countries have accepted Iran’s new offer to hold talks.

* ‘Silwan archaeological tunnel extended’ The extension of an archaeological tunnel under the City of David has caused upset among Palestinians.

* Putin hints at presidential bid Russian PM Vladimir Putin has given the clearest indication yet that he might run again for the Russian presidency.

* Jordan signs deal for 1st nuclear power plant Jordan signed a $12 million deal Saturday with a Belgian company as it pushes forward with a plan to build the first nuclear power plant for the oil-barren dessert kingdom.

* Deputy PM: Time is now for action on Iran nukes Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor said “the time is now” for Israel and the world to act to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

* Putin Signals He Is Considering Return to Russia’s Presidency Vladimir Putin, Russia’s current premier and former president, gave the clearest signal to date that he is considering a return to his old job.

09/11/09

* Obama in tribute to 9/11 victims US President Barack Obama has paid tribute to the victims of the 11 September 2001 attacks.

* Rockets hit Israel from Lebanon Two rockets have been fired into northern Israel from Lebanon.

* Schulte: Syria may have more nuke sites Syria may be operating more nuclear sites, apart from the reactor at Deir Azour which was bombed by Israel on September 6, 2007.

* Iran leader vows ‘harsh response’ Iran’s supreme leader has vowed to confront those who threaten national security, amid continuing disputes over the presidential election.

* Global Jihad group likely behind Katyusha attack on North A small-scale Global Jihad terror group was likely behind the firing of at least two Katyusha rockets into northern Israel on Friday afternoon.

* Putin: We have no reason to doubt Iran Vladmir Putin on warned against the use of force or new sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program.

* Clinton stresses key China goals China and the US will open a dialogue on counter-terrorism issues this year.

* Gold Climbs to 18-Month High as Dollar Weakens; Silver Gains Gold surged to the highest price since March 2008, heading for a fourth-straight weekly gain.

* Venezuela’s Chavez draws closer to Moscow Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez cemented a closer alliance with Russia on Thursday.

* EU puts Middle East policies on hold until US talks The EU is waiting until the US, Israel and the Palestinian authorities hold talks at the end of this month before moving ahead with two of its most sensitive Middle East policies.

The Emerging Axis of Iran and Venezuela

By: Robert M. Morgenthau – The Wall Street Journal

The diplomatic ties between Iran and Venezuela go back almost 50 years and until recently amounted to little more than the routine exchange of diplomats. With the election of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2005, the relationship dramatically changed.

Today Mr. Ahmadinejad and Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez have created a cozy financial, political and military partnership rooted in a shared anti-American animus. Now is the time to develop policies in this country to ensure this partnership produces no poisonous fruit.

Signs of the evolving partnership began to emerge in 2006, when Venezuela joined Cuba and Syria as the only nations to vote against a U.N. Atomic Energy Agency resolution to report Iran to the Security Council over its failures to abide U.N. sanctions to curtail its nuclear program. A year later, during a visit by Mr. Chávez to Tehran, the two nations declared an “axis of unity” against the U.S. and Ecuador. And in June of this year, while protesters lined the streets of Tehran following the substantial allegations of fraud in the re-election of Mr. Ahmadinejad, Mr. Chávez publicly offered him support. As the regime cracked down on political dissent, jailing, torturing and killing protesters, Venezuela stood with the Iranian hard-liners.

Meanwhile, Iranian investments in Venezuela have been rising. The two countries have signed various Memoranda of Understanding on technology development, cooperation on banking and finance, and oil and gas exploration and refining. In April 2008, the two countries also signed a Memorandum of Understanding pledging full military support and cooperation. United Press International reported in August that Iranian military advisers have been embedded with Venezuelan troops.

According to a report published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in December of last year, Venezuela has an estimated 50,000 tons of unmined uranium. There is speculation in the Carnegie report that Venezuela could be mining uranium for Iran.

The Iranians have also opened International Development Bank in Caracas under the Spanish name Banco Internacional de Desarrollo C.A., an independent subsidiary of Export Development Bank of Iran. Last October the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control imposed economic sanctions against both of these Iranian banks for providing or attempting to provide financial services to Iran’s Ministry of Defense and its Armed Forces Logistics—the two Iranian military entities tasked with advancing Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

My office has been told that that over the past three years a number of Iranian-owned and controlled factories have sprung up in remote and undeveloped parts of Venezuela—ideal locations for the illicit production of weapons. Evidence of the type of activity conducted inside the factories is limited. But we should be concerned, especially in light of an incident in December 2008. Turkish authorities detained an Iranian vessel bound for Venezuela after discovering lab equipment capable of producing explosives packed inside 22 containers marked “tractor parts.” The containers also allegedly contained barrels labeled with “danger” signs. I think it is safe to assume that this was a lucky catch—and that most often shipments of this kind reach their destination in Venezuela.

A recent U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) study reported a high level of corruption within the Venezuelan government, military and law enforcement that has allowed that country to become a major transshipment route for trafficking cocaine out of Colombia. Intelligence gathered by my office strongly supports the conclusion that Hezbollah supporters in South America are engaged in the trafficking of narcotics. The GAO study also confirms allegations of Venezuelan support for FARC, the Colombian terrorist insurgency group that finances its operations through narcotics trafficking, extortion and kidnapping.

In a raid on a FARC training camp this July, Colombian military operatives recovered Swedish-made anti-tank rocket launchers sold to Venezuela in the 1980s. Sweden believes this demonstrates a violation of the end-user agreement by Venezuela, as the Swedish manufacturer was never authorized to sell arms to Colombia. Venezuelan Interior Minister Tareck El Aissami, a Venezuelan of Syrian origin, lamely called the allegations a “media show,” and “part of a campaign against our people, our government and our institutions.”

In the past several years Iranian entities have employed a pervasive system of deceitful and fraudulent practices to move money all over the world without detection. The regime has done this, I believe, to pay for materials necessary to develop nuclear weapons, long-range missiles, and road-side bombs. Venezuela has an established financial system that Iran, with the help of Mr. Chávez’s government, can exploit to avoid economic sanctions.

Consider, for example, the United Kingdom bank Lloyds TSB. From 2001 to 2004, on behalf of Iranian banks and their customers, the bank admitted in a statement of facts to my office that it intentionally altered wire transfer information to hide the identity of its clients. This allowed the illegal transfer of more than $300 million of Iranian cash despite economic sanctions prohibiting Iranian access to the U.S. financial system. In January, Lloyds entered into deferred prosecution agreements with my office and the Justice Department to resolve the investigation.

In April, we also announced the indictment of a company called Limmt, and its manager, Li Fang Wei. The U.S. government had banned Limmt from engaging in transactions with or through the U.S. financial system because of its role in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction to Iran. But our investigation revealed that Li Fang Wei and Limmt used aliases and shell companies to deceive banks into processing payments related to the shipment of banned missile, nuclear and so-called dual use materials to subsidiary organizations of the Iranian Defense Industries Organization. (Limmt, through the international press, has denied the allegations in the indictment.) The tactics used in these cases should send a strong signal to law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and military commands throughout the world about the style and level of deception the Iranians’ employ. Based on information developed by my office, we believe that the Iranians, with the help of Venezuela, are now engaged in similar sanctions-busting schemes.

Why is Hugo Chávez willing to open up his country to a foreign nation with little shared history or culture? I believe it is because his regime is bent on becoming a regional power, and is fanatical in its approach to dealing with the U.S. The diplomatic overture of President Barack Obama in shaking Mr. Chávez’s hand in April at the Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago is no reason to assume the threat has diminished. In fact, with the groundwork laid years ago, we are entering a period where the fruits of the Iran-Venezuela bond will begin to ripen.

That means two of the world’s most dangerous regimes, the self-described “axis of unity,” will be acting together in our backyard on the development of nuclear and missile technology. And it seems that terrorist groups have found the perfect operating ground for training and planning, and financing their activities through narco-trafficking.

The Iranian nuclear and long-range missile threats, and creeping Iranian influence in the Western Hemisphere, cannot be overlooked. My office and other law-enforcement agencies can help ensure that money laundering, terror financing, and sanctions violations are not ignored, and that criminals and the banks that aid Iran will be discovered and prosecuted. But U.S. law enforcement alone is not enough to counter the threat.

The public needs to be aware of Iran’s growing presence in Latin America. Moreover, the U.S. and the international community must strongly consider ways to monitor and sanction Venezuela’s banking system. Failure to act will leave open a window susceptible to money laundering by the Iranian government, the narcotics organizations with ties to corrupt elements in the Venezuelan government, and the terrorist organizations that Iran supports openly.

Please note: These stories are located outside of Prophecy Today’s website. Prophecy Today is not responsible for their content and does not necessarily agree with the views expressed therein. These articles are provided for your information.

09/10/09

* Kremlin official confirms PM’s trip A senior Kremlin official confirmed Wednesday to the Russian paper Kommersant that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu did indeed make a clandestine trip to Russia on Monday.

* Gas Bonanza Investors Ready to Dive in Dead Sea for Black Gold An oil drilling consortium which includes companies that found billions of dollars in natural gas off the Haifa coast will begin in October to look for black gold in an area along the Dead Sea.

* Lebanese PM-designate resigns after failing to form cabinet Lebanese Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri said Thursday he is abandoning efforts to form a new government.

* Iran: We won’t discuss nuclear program Just a day after Iran presented world powers with a proposal for new talks, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, suggested on Thursday that any negotiations with Western powers would not address the Islamic republic’s nuclear program.

* U.S. Says Iran Could Expedite Nuclear Bomb American intelligence agencies have concluded in recent months that Iran has created enough nuclear fuel to make a rapid, if risky, sprint for a nuclear weapon.

* 80% of Europeans against Iran strike European support for the US president’s handling of foreign policy has soared since President Barack Obama took over from former President George W. Bush.

* Ya’alon: Right to build ‘indisputable’ Vice Premier Moshe Ya’alon continued to place himself at odds with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on Wednesday when he spoke in favor of settlement development and against territorial concessions.

* Afghan fraud ballots invalidated The Afghan Electoral Complaints Commission (ECC) has for the first time invalidated some ballots from the presidential election because of fraud.

* Barroso Nears Second EU Term as Socialists Fail to Block Vote European Commission President Jose Barroso headed for a second term after his Socialist opponents failed to block a parliamentary confidence vote next week.

* Russia, Venezuela sign package of oil deals Russia and Venezuela signed on Thursday a package of deals, including one to develop the Latin American country’s Orinoco oil belt.

09/09/09

* US Admits Iran near ‘Breakout Point’ for Nuclear Bomb The United States has confirmed long-time Israeli intelligence reports that Iran is close to achieving the ability to produce a nuclear bomb.

* PM’s ‘military installation’ tour was ‘secret trip to Russia’ The reason for Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s mysterious 10-hour disappearance from the media radar on Monday was a clandestine trip to Russia.

* PA Calls Building for Jews ‘Incitement’ The Palestinian Authority official who oversees the “settlement portfolio” has charged that Israeli building of homes for Jews in Judea and Samaria is “incitement”.

* Hamas, Fatah set to reconcile by 2010 Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal’s recent visit to Egypt has brought the Islamist movement and Fatah closer to ending their differences.

* Transport Minister promises to invest millions in Jewish Hebron Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz (Likud) on Tuesday visited the West Bank city of Hebron, where he promised settlers he would invest millions of shekels to improve the road connecting Kiryat Arba to the Tomb of the Patriarchs.

* EU Criticizes Israeli Settlements The European Union has expressed concern about Israel’s decision to approve new settler homes in the occupied West Bank.

* The Emerging Axis of Iran and Venezuela The diplomatic ties between Iran and Venezuela go back almost 50 years and until recently amounted to little more than the routine exchange of diplomats.

* Market crisis ‘will happen again’ The world will suffer another financial crisis.

* Underwater laser pops in navy ops US military researchers are developing a method for communication that uses lasers to make sound underwater.

* Top defense official: Syria losing clout over ‘Hezbollahstan’ Syria may not be able to curb Lebanon’s Hezbollah guerrillas, a senior Israeli defense official said on Tuesday.

Hevron Massacre, 80 Years After

By: Hillel Fendel – Arutz Sheva

The Jewish Community of Hevron marked the 80th anniversary of the 1929 pogrom, in which 67 Jews were slaughtered with axes and otherwise by their Arab neighbors, at a public ceremony in the City of the Patriarchs on Monday. Survivors and descendants of victims of the carnage were present, as were Knesset Speaker Ruby Rivlin (whose mother’s cousins were among the victims) and Minister Yuli Edelstein.

The massacre not only destroyed the Hevron Jewish community, but was also part of a series of lethal Arab violence that shook the entire Jewish populace, known as the “yishuv,” in pre-State Palestine. An early formation of the ‘Hagana’ defense forces prevented the massacre of the Jews of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and Haifa, and also held at bay thousands of Arabs who had come to kill the Jews of Hulda, near Rehovot. However, Jews were killed in Motza and Tzfat (Safed), and were evacuated to safety from Gaza – thus ending the long-time existence of the Jewish community there.

Former Knesset Member Elyakim HaEtzni, a Kiryat Arba resident and expert in Hevron history, told Arutz-7 that two main population sectors were seriously shaken by the massacres:

“The first group shocked by the murders was the ‘Old Yishuv,’ i.e., Jews who were either anti-Zionist or were not part of the pro-Zionist camp. According to their own accounts, these Jews had been living peacefully with their Arab neighbors in Hevron for generations, and had even received promises from them that nothing bad would happen to them. The Jews were convinced that the murderous Arab opposition was aimed only at the Zionists and Zionism, and they never prepared any defense against this violence, thinking that they were not part of the dispute. They also did not wish to upset the Arabs by giving them the impression that they didn’t trust them.”

“The second group traumatized by the massacres,” continued HaEtzni, “was the Zionists. The depth of their trauma can only be appreciated by studying the Zionist ethos of that period. The Zionists believed that as soon as a Jew set his foot on this soil, new rules would apply to him. The Zionists felt that the conditions of the exile simply did not apply here. But if you compare the accounts of the 1929 Arab massacre of Jews in Hevron to the accounts of the Kishinev pogroms 25 years earlier, you will be startled by the parallels. The fact that a pogrom could take place here, simply did not jibe with the Zionist worldview.”

One of the survivors of what has become known as the Tarpat Slaughter in Hevron (Tarpat is the Hebrew equivalent of the Jewish year 5689, in which the massacre occurred) was Rabbi Dov Cohen, who was a 17-year-old student in the Yeshiva of Hevron, Knesset Yisrael-Slobodka at the time. He spoke to Arutz-7 on the 70th anniversary of the massacre.
Asked if he remembers any warning signs of what was about to happen, Rabbi Cohen said:

“Until that time, in Hevron, the Jews lived in peace and quiet with the Arabs. There was tension in the country for a whole a week or two before the massacre. Not only in Hevron, but all over the country, although in Hevron it was a bit worse. As I said, relations with our Arab neighbors, prior to that night, were very good. After a day of studies, the yeshiva boys used to go for long walks on the outskirts of the city, even very late at night, and feared nothing…”

Arutz-7: Did the Arabs also attack the yeshiva in Hevron on the night of the massacre?

Rabbi Cohen: Not exactly. Allow me to explain: On Friday, Arab youths started to throw rocks at us in our part of the city. Late that afternoon, a young student named Shmuel Rosenholtz went to the yeshiva before the rest of the students. He was there alone, and some time later, Arab rioters broke into the yeshiva and murdered him. After Shabbat began, we were informed that Shmuel had been murdered, and that he was lying dead [in the study hall]. We were instructed not to go to the yeshiva over Shabbat.

Anyhow, that night, the son of Rabbi Slonim, who was the manager of what later became Bank Leumi, went from house to house, telling people that, upon his father’s instructions, whomever was concerned for his own safety was invited to stay in his home. Rabbi Slonim was highly regarded in the community and even had a gun. I was personally not so worried about the danger, and so I did not go to the Slonim home, although many people did. In the course of that Shabbat, the Arabs murdered more people in that house than anywhere else.

On Shabbat morning, almost the entire Jewish population gathered at the police station, Beit Romano. Everyone recounted what had happened in his home the previous night. We prayed the morning service. There was no Torah there from which to read, just a Bible. After completing the Mussaf service, we prepared to recite the Kiddush prayer. All of a sudden, we began hearing noises outside the building; masses of Arabs were gathering on the streets outside of the police station. I looked out the window, and saw that thousands of Arabs were descending from Har Hevron to the valley below – all shouting “Itbach el Yahud! (Kill the Jews!)” At one point, some of them tried to break down the door of the police station.

[Ed. note: The survivors remained in Beit Romano for three days. The Arabs sacked their houses and destroyed their property. A religious quorum of ten men was allowed to participate in the funeral for the murdered Jews, held at night, in the ancient Jewish cemetery in the city. The surviving Jews were taken to Jerusalem – exiled from their homes and from the city of the Patriarchs. For the first time in hundreds of years, Hevron had no Jewish residents.]

Arutz-7: What do you think today of the Jewish settlement in Hevron?

Rabbi Cohen: I am very happy …but I am still sad that we were exiled from Hevron, I still have a heavy heart when I think of it. When there wasn’t a Jewish community there at all, it was painful. It is a little bit of a consolation [that a Jewish community exists there today]…but it is still impossible for Jews to reach certain neighborhoods where we used to live…

Arutz-7: There is a portion of the Israeli population that believes that Jews there are guilty of harming the relations with the Arabs.

Rabbi Cohen: Why? The Jews have no right to live there? The Jews, who were bequeathed the city from the patriarchs? And who lived there hundreds of years?!

Please note: These stories are located outside of Prophecy Today’s website. Prophecy Today is not responsible for their content and does not necessarily agree with the views expressed therein. These articles are provided for your information.

Fortress Asia: Is a Powerful New Trade Bloc Forming?

By: Michael Schuman – Yahoo News

The Great Recession hasn’t been great for free trade. As unemployment rose and consumer demand dried up throughout much of the world, governments have been more focused on protecting their own industries and workers than making the compromises necessary to promote international commerce. The U.S., typically an enthusiastic trade promoter, included “Buy American” clauses in its stimulus package and propped up its flailing auto industry with handouts that in better times would have been criticized as unfair subsidies. Although a meeting of ministers in New Delhi in early September promised to restart long-stalled World Trade Organization negotiations aimed at reaching a new, global consensus on freer trade, wide differences remain between the developed and developing world that make a final deal difficult.

Yet against this dim backdrop, the part of the world that was hit hardest by the trade crash – Asia – has been actively opening up its regional markets. According to the Asian Development Bank, the number of free-trade agreements (FTAs) signed by Asian countries has grown from just three in 2000 to 56 by the end of August. Nineteen of those FTAs have been made among 16 major Asian economies, a trend that could help Asia become a powerful trading bloc on par with the one created by the North American Free Trade Agreement. “Asian integration is sort of a dream, but it is much more realistic than it was before,” says Ganeshan Wignaraja, an Asia Development Bank economist. “There is a move toward making a better business environment in Asia. The momentum is quite strong.” (See pictures of the global financial crisis.)

That can be seen clearly in the continuing stream of agreements tying together regional powers. In August, India inked two FTAs in a week, with South Korea and the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Meanwhile, ASEAN and China are expected to bring most of the final tariff reductions of an FTA signed in 2004 into full effect in 2010. More deals are likely to come. Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou has made his No.1 policy priority reaching a “comprehensive economic framework” with China that would reduce tariffs on Taiwan goods entering the Chinese market. Yukio Hatoyama, likely the next prime minister of Japan, has stressed the need for greater integration in Asia, even proposing the establishment of a euro-style common currency.

Although this trend has been in place for several years, the drive to lower trade barriers has taken on fresh urgency amid the recession. Fears of an extended slump in spending by U.S. consumers – primary buyers of Asia’s manufactured goods – have prompted policymakers to look to China, India and other countries in the region as customers for exports. “This whole notion of being able to export yourself [into] a recovery and aiming at the U.S. market I think is not possible anymore,” Malaysia Prime Minister Najib Razak told CNN in August. “So we do need to configure a new economic model.” As manufacturing networks in the region become more intertwined – and as Asian consumers become wealthier and freer spending – trade within Asia is now seen as critical to future economic expansion. Asia’s nascent recovery has shown the potentially huge benefits. Intra-regional trade last year made up 57% of total Asia trade, up from just 37% in 1980. “In the past Asia produced for America and Europe,” Philippines President Gloria Arroyo said in a recent CNBC interview. “Now, Asia is producing for Asia.”

Of course, Asia is still dependent on sales to the West. But regional free-trade agreements could reduce the region’s exposure to the U.S. by giving Asian companies preferential treatment in selling to Asian companies and consumers. These benefits could come with downsides for the world as a whole, however. Companies in countries left out of the trade pacts – for example, the U.S. – could face competitive disadvantages when trying to tap fast-growing Asian markets. This, in turn, could have a negative impact on efforts to rebalance excessive debt and deficits in the U.S. and excessive savings in Asia. Bilateral FTAs “create a non-level playing field with advantages for Asian countries,” says Eswar Prasad, professor of trade policy at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. “If the most dynamically growing part of the global economy gives the U.S. restricted access, that has an impact on the whole rebalancing movement.”

Some analysts also worry that intra-Asian trade pacts could hinder WTO trade negotiations. Asia’s FTAs are a clear expression of how frustrated Asian governments have become with the WTO process – with fewer parties at the table, bilateral agreements have proven easier to attain than a sweeping, global consensus. But “the world will not be better off if we separate into different trading blocs,” says Edward Leung, chief economist at the Hong Kong Trade Development Council.

Richard Baldwin, professor of international economics at the Graduate Institute in Geneva, believes that Asia will remain heavily reliant on demand from the West for years to come. Tariffs in Asia have already come down so significantly, he says, that the additional benefits of FTAs don’t give Asian firms that much of an edge over foreign rivals. “So far the margins of preference are low and so the degree of discrimination is low,” he says. Some analysts also see clear limits to how closely Asian nations are willing to tie themselves together. Continued political and economic rivalries, especially between the big economies of north Asia (China, South Korea and Japan), place high hurdles in the path of a true Asia trade bloc. “The notion that there is going to be a ‘Fortress Asia’ is really not correct,” says Vinod Aggarwal, director of the APEC Study Center at the University of California-Berkeley.

Still, the attraction of the benefits from greater regional integration could prove powerful enough to eventually overcome the roadblocks. ADB’s Wignaraja foresees Asia becoming a NAFTA-style free-trading zone within the next 10 years. “In Asia, the only thing everyone agrees upon is business,” he says. “In the end, pragmatism will prevail.” If so, the world economy will never be the same.

Please note: These stories are located outside of Prophecy Today’s website. Prophecy Today is not responsible for their content and does not necessarily agree with the views expressed therein. These articles are provided for your information.