In mid-August 1929, tensions between Jews and Arabs in British Mandate Palestine were growing, tensions that would soon lead to one of the worst massacres of Jewish civilians in Palestine or the future State of Israel – the Hebron Massacre.
The Jewish community of Hebron had been living continuously in the city for hundreds of years prior to 1929, it being home to one of Judaism’s holiest sites – the Cave of the Patriarchs. Yeshivot (seminaries) regularly brought a steady flow of religious students to the city and dozens of families had lived among the local Arab population peacefully for centuries. The coexistence in Hebron was in fact common to a handful of ancient cities spread throughout the land.
But in 1929, over a decade after the Balfour Declaration, as the push for the fulfillment of Jewish nationalism began picking up steam with accelerated immigration, tensions began growing and violent incidents became more frequent.
On August 15, a group of Jews organized themselves to assert sovereignty over the Western Wall in Jerusalem, and held a march near the Temple Mount accented by nationalist flags and songs. News of the heavily protected march put on by the Beitar movement, considered by local Arab and Muslim authorities to be provocative, quickly spread throughout the land and fictitious rumors that Arabs had been killed sprouted and circulated. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem told his followers that Jews were planning to reconstruct the Jewish temple on the site of the Al-Aksa Mosque.
Violence suddenly broke out in Jerusalem and was threatening to spread to other regions.
In Hebron, which had been spared much of the violence that was taking place in the rest of the land, local Arabs, spurred by the Mufti and the rumor mill, began staging small-scale attacks on the local Jewish community. Despite an absolute minimal police presence, the Jewish community of Hebron continued to believe that the good relations they enjoyed with their Arab neighbors would spare them from the threat of violence that was hanging in the air of the ancient city.
An elderly American Jewish immigrant, Aharon Reuven Bernzweig, who was visiting Hebron with his wife at the time, later wrote to his family of the mood: “We had forebodings that something terrible was about to happen – but what, exactly, we did not know.”
“I was fearful and kept questioning the local people, who had lived there for generations. They assured me that in Hebron there could never be a pogrom, because as many times as there had been trouble elsewhere in Eretz Israel, Hebron had remained quiet. The local population had always lived very peacefully with the Arabs.”
On Friday, August 24, the local Jewish community’s faith that it would be spared any violence began to crack. Some 700 local Arabs gathered in a city square, intent on traveling to Jerusalem to protect the Al-Aksa Mosque from a rumored attack by Jews. That afternoon, a young Hebron yeshiva student was stabbed to death. The Jews of Hebron began worrying and many went into hiding.
The next morning, on Saturday, the violence escalated. The lone British policeman stationed in the city, with fewer than two dozen Arab officers under his command, vainly attempted to calm the growing mob. Mounted Arab deputies tried dispersing the crowds but they were woefully undermanned and ultimately unsuccessful. Desperate requests for backup from police in other cities were answered but did not arrive in time.
Over 500 Jews were in Hebron that day. Mobs began going door to door in a pogram-esque search for Jews, breaking into houses and literally slaughtering all whom they found.
But more than 400 of the remaining Hebron Jews were saved by some two dozen Arab families who hid them in their homes, protecting them from the blood-thirsty mobs.
In his letter, Bernzweig described how a neighboring Arab family protected him and 33 other Jews in their home as the mobs came time and again, demanding that any Jews be handed over: “Five times the Arabs stormed our house with axes, and all the while those wild murderers kept screaming at the Arabs who were standing guard to hand over the Jews. They, in turn, shouted back that they had not hidden any Jews and knew nothing.”
Later that day, Arab policemen rounded up the surviving Jews and brought them to a police station where they were kept and protected for nearly three days before being evacuated to Jerusalem.
Some 435 Hebron Jews were saved that day by local Arab families and ultimately by police, but 63 were slaughtered by the mob armed with with knives and swords.
The incident marked the end the Hebron Jewish community’s continuous presence in the city for hundreds of years. A number of members of the community did return to Hebron two years later but fearing another massacre, the British evacuated them once again in 1936 at the start of the Great Arab Revolt.
Jews would eventually return to live in Hebron, but never again with the quiet coexistence that prevailed up until 1929.
Author Archives: jimmy
08/30/11
08/29/11
* Syrian forces surround town after soldiers defect Residents in town near Homs say tanks, armored vehicles begin firing with machine guns in operation to counter dissent within military.
* Gaddafi still threat for Libya and world – NTC’s Jalil Col Muammar Gaddafi still poses a danger for Libya and the world, the head of the Libyan rebels has said.
* Abbas: We won’t recognize Israel as Jewish state Palestinian leader defiant ahead of UN statehood bid, urges international community to back off.
* Iran Plans to Include Egypt in Terror Axis Iran announced it will renew relations with the new Egyptian regime by sending an ambassador to Cairo in several months.
* Libya threatens to become terrorist arms depot Post-Gaddafi chaos exposes arsenals of small arms and chemicals to raids by smugglers and militants.
* Turkey: Up to 160 Kurd rebels killed in n. Iraq strikes Turkish air, artillery strikes come after at least 40 Turkish security personnel killed in PKK attacks in southern Turkey.
* Polish finance minister says Europe at risk of collapse Polish finance minister Jacek Rostowski has said the EU could collapse if leading countries such as Germany mishandle the financial crisis.
* Iran denies Revolutionary Guard helping Syria suppress protests European Union claims Revolutionary Guard provided Syrian President Bashar Assad with technical help, equipment and other support.
* Israel could not stop nuclear Iran with one strike Senior defense official tells foreign reporters Islamic Republic differs from Iraq, Syria where one strike can derail nuclear program; claims US stands better chance to force Tehran to halt atomic quest
* Coming to a theater near you… Jerusalem in 3D IMAX extravaganza with bird’s eye views of the capital city to be screened for next 5-10 years on 35 screens around world.
08/27/11
08/26/11
08/25/11
08/24/11
Reshaping Defense for Big Savings
The U.S. economy is faltering, with budget deficits and a debt crisis that threaten our global leadership and the health of our military instrument of power. President Obama and Congress must act to protect our security while the Pentagon shares some of the debt burden.
The recent political deal on the debt ceiling created a congressional “Super Committee” to find $1.5 trillion in savings by Nov. 23 or force mandatory across-the-board cuts, half from the Pentagon. That result “would have devastating effects” on top of $350 billion in other cuts, warns Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta.
Unfortunately, it may be too late to prepare the Pentagon for draconian cuts should the Super Committee fail to find the needed cuts. But it isn’t too late for Obama to begin reshaping our military to become more efficient without hurting our security.
Obama should provide Panetta three sets of reshaping guidance to cut costs while preserving our security: cost-cutting guidelines, operational principles, and specific areas to consider when cutting.
First, Obama’s cost-cutting guidelines should address nonnegotiable priorities, maintaining the all-volunteer force, eliminating unnecessary duplication, minimizing overseas basing, and consolidating military infrastructure at home.
The President should provide a tiered list of nonnegotiable defense guidelines, beginning with the most critical—U.S. survival against nuclear attack. Our most critical defense missions must be fully funded, while those further down the President’s list receive less than full funding and we accept that risk.
He must issue directions to maintain the all-volunteer force because there is no viable substitute. But history shows that significant downturns in military budgets have been followed by personnel problems (readiness, training and retention). Already Panetta has warned more cuts would imperil the all-volunteer military and “would literally undercut our ability to put together the kind of strong national defense we need.”
Obama should direct the Pentagon to eliminate unnecessary duplication of forces and staffs. Relook at the need for special forces in each service, the need for both Army and Marine ground forces, and consider consolidating specialties such as medical personnel under a single service. And we don’t need a large staff for both service secretary and service chief of staff. Then look at the glut of top personnel, such as the excessive number of deputy assistant secretaries of defense, and flag and general officers, the highest number ever.
The President should call for less overseas and stateside basing infrastructure. For example, our military stations 80,000 personnel on 400 facilities in Europe. Most of those personnel and their families could be brought home without jeopardizing our mission. The same is true for our troops in South Korea and the thousands of Marines in Okinawa.
Reduce overseas facility redundancies. Why do we need two air bases in the United Kingdom, Lakenheath and Mildenhall, which are eight miles apart? For that matter, we have two air bases in Germany, Ramstein and Spangdahlem, which are 68 miles apart. Many of our overseas facilities could either be consolidated or collocated with the host-nation militaries, not only saving money but truly building stronger partnerships.
The same concept applies to military infrastructure at home. We dramatically reduced the number of facilities “owned” by the military over the past two decades by Base Realignment Commissions (BRAC). But that process must change because, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, the last BRAC saved very little.
It is clear we need more infrastructure reductions to cut costs. For example, our military services have a combined 61 bases in California alone. Each base is a costly enterprise that includes a staff and may support agencies. Better use of fewer facilities is a must.
Second, Obama should direct the Pentagon to sustain defense effectiveness and contain costs by applying principles such as preservation of force structure, weapons procurement and modernization, and readiness, and keeping these in balance. When they are out of balance, the military is either ill-equipped, lacking in capacity or not ready. A good roles and missions analysis performed by nonpartisans without service, industry or congressional biases should produce recommendations that best balance the armed forces.
Another principle is maintaining the industrial base’s accountability. After the Cold War, Congress put the Pentagon on a strict procurement diet, but it kept the industrial base alive with infusions of billions of dollars for research and development (R&D). Unfortunately, there was little accountability for that money.
This time, any R&D money must come with strings and strict accountability mechanisms. Already we have seen multiple billions wasted on R&D during this buildup that will never support our troops or go into production. We clearly need a new R&D paradigm.
Finally, the President should direct the Pentagon to consider certain organizations and systems for the chopping block.
Reorient our reserves to produce major savings. The Pentagon activated much of our reserve component force to support operations in the wake of 9/11, which was incredibly expensive. It is time the reserves return to their former status.
Many commissions and think-tank groups recommended killing or dramatically cutting the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program, the most expensive in our nation’s history. Meanwhile, JSF costs continue to grow, capabilities slip or fall off, and deliveries of combat-capable aircraft face additional delays. Justify the JSF or kill the program.
The services should reduce costs by using common aircraft. For instance, why do the Air Force and Navy have very similar but different manufactured unmanned aerial vehicles—Global Hawks and the Broad Area Maritime Surveillance? With the budget downturn and future recapitalization and modernization requirements, this is an easy cut.
The space budget has gone virtually unnoticed and unscathed in this downturn. The spending for space has more than doubled in this buildup while multibillion-dollar satellites can be destroyed by Chinese anti-satellite weapons for just a fraction of the cost. This issue warrants close scrutiny.
The Navy has a 286-ship force to meet its global requirements, but Adm. Gary Roughead, the chief of naval operations, testified it needs a minimum of 313 ships to meet future requirements. A larger fleet may be necessary, but the President should call for a reevaluation of our need for 11 carrier battle groups, which include 60 to 80 aircraft, and numerous ships to protect and support the carrier.
Carriers are becoming vulnerable to the emerging Chinese threat. Last December, Adm. Robert Willard, the commander of the U.S. Pacific Command, told a Japanese newspaper that China is developing an anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) known as an “aircraft carrier killer.”
Our government has 16 intelligence agencies mostly controlled by the Pentagon. It is past time we eliminate intelligence duplication, which should begin with the top-heavy Defense Intelligence Agency.
Time is short for Obama to act before the debt crisis threatens the viability of our military instrument of power. These guidelines, principles and cuts provide the President a prudent way ahead that protects our security, improves Pentagon efficiency and significantly contributes to debt relief.
08/23/11
08/22/11
* Libya conflict: Fighting rages near Gaddafi compound Libyan rebels are battling troops loyal to Col Muammar Gaddafi for control of Tripoli, after they launched an assault on the capital from several directions.
* Israel and Hamas agree Gaza truce, officials say Israel and Hamas, the Palestinian Islamist group which governs the Gaza Strip, say they have agreed to a ceasefire after five days of violence.
* Just as Iran threatens us, so too it threatens US Netanyahu emphasizes Gaza-Iran connection to US Congressmen delegation.
* Nato and EU prepare for imminent end to Libya conflict Nato and EU leaders have urged Libyan rebels not to take revenge against Gaddafi loyalists after opposition forces swept into Tripoli over the weekend.
* Iran moves centrifuges to underground site Islamic Republic transfers some of its uranium enrichment machines to subterranean facility offering better protection from possible airstrikes
* Gaddafi collapse will embolden Arab rebels Rebels’ success in Libya will shake the confidence of rulers who believe their military-backed governments are immune to popular discontent.
* A Million Israelis Under Fire Noam Bedein of Sderot took a trip to Ashdod and felt right at home,unfortunately.
* Hamas officials go underground in fear of Israeli attack Hamas PM Haniyeh, senior official Zahar operating with restricted movement within Gaza, according to Arab media.
* Assad: Obama Is The One Who Should Resign Syrian President Bashar Assad calls in interview on Syrian state television on President Barack Obama to resign for supporting Israel.
* Libya’s leader Gadhafi defiant to end In this Feb. 5, 2001 file photo, Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi listens to questions during a news conference in Tripoli, Libya.